Archive for July 4, 2008

Surf Fisherman Catches 3 Sharks on Amelia Island

AMELIA ISLAND, Fla. — On a holiday known for being a day for beachgoers, visitors to one Northeast Florida beach got a little more than they expected — sharks.

At the tip of Amelia Island, beachgoers saw a fisherman reel in three sharks on the Fourth of July.

The man was surf fishing when he said he caught a 6-foot shark, a 7-foot shark and a 3-foot shark. He said he lost a fourth shark as he was reeling it in.

Source: News4Jax.com

I’ve seen very large sharks caught in very shallow water off of Fernandina Beach.

Leave a comment »

Happy Birthday, America!

We went to the town fireworks display this evening. There weren’t a whole lot of places to park to see it. We ended up in the Winn Dixie parking lot along with nearly everybody else in town. There were no empty parking places, and so we ended up having to park in the empty retention pond at the Wendy’s across the street.

Most of the trucks had lil’ kids with sparklers, and some parents were setting off fireworks in the parking lot for the amusement of the kids. Illegal fireworks that the state says we can’t have because they’re too dangerous. Flying fireworks are illegal. Only sparklers are legal. Police officers occasionally try to enforce the law at the beaches, but didn’t even bother trying at Winn Dixie.

We watched the town’s fireworks, impressive as usual, and then went home. Amazing what a bunch of hardened lawbreakers we observed shooting off rockets and roman candles in their yards on the way home. I’m also glad to see that people are mostly ignoring a law that they consider stupid.

Once we arrived home, I went out and stood in the pasture with the horse and sheep until the fireworks at the neighbors had died down. The 4th of July and New Year’s Eve is a frightening time for sheep, horses, dogs and cats. The sheep were huddled against the pasture fence as far as they could get away from the scary noise and lights. The mare also had her butt to a fence and was warily observing the lights in the sky but relaxed immediately and started cropping grass when I arrived and scratched her on the shoulder and showed there was nothing to fear.

Comments (1) »

Phony “Contractors” Busted

ATLANTIC BEACH, FL — Barbara Brown hired a contractor for improvements, but he left her home in shambles.

“I was disgusted,” Brown said, “I was upset with him and I just couldn’t understand why he took the money and didn’t do the work.”

Brown was a victim of an unlicensed contractor.

They often blend in with the rest of the bunch, advertising their plumbing, roofing, and electrical services in print and in cyberspace.

It was on Craigslist where investigators with the Department of Business and Professional Regulation found eleven individuals from the First Coast advertising for jobs that require a state license.

“We called their cell phone numbers and had them come out to a location at Atlantic Beach,” said Sandra Rentfrow with the Department of Business and Professional Regulation.

Rentfrow says their investigators teamed with the Atlantic Beach Police Department to cite and fine the bad contractors.

She says people are prone to get played year round, but especially during hurricane season.

She recalls a few years ago when the First Coast was hit hard by rough weather.

“It was overbearing the amount of people who were out taking money from individuals to do work on homes and they would take deposits and then never show up again.”

Rentfrow says the Department is constantly checking to try and prevent stories like Barbara Brown’s.

“We take ads out of the newspaper, we take ads through the mail, and we sweep neighborhoods,” said Rentfrow. “If we see people working on properties or on homes, we’ll stop and check and see if the people doing the work are in fact licensed.”

Rentfrow says be sure you ask for referrals, and if a contractor asks you for money up front, it’s often a sign something may be wrong.

Go to the Department of Business and Professional Regulation’s website to check on a contractor’s license status, or call the local office at 904-727-5591.

The people cited and fined $1000 were Roger Carl Vining, Jarrod Durdin, Larry Couf, Hector Cerrillo, Charles Bruce Vann, Robert L. Fourman, Michael King, Reginaldo Ridolfi, Jarred Urso, Keith Shipman, and Graig S. Dry.

Source: FirstCoastNews

Speaking as former licensed contracting professionals that were in the building business for @ 30 years, I would like to say that I was truly appalled by how trusting homeowners were. I have gone to a potential customer’s house to give a bid on, say, a new driveway. I would measure the area, do a detailed sketch with measurements of any additional sidewalks or parking area they wanted, and give a bid based on that. I have been startled to hear the homeowner say “Okay. Let me go get the cash” (or check, or combination thereof).

“NO!” I would blurt out, and do my part for consumer education in an attempt to keep them from making the same mistake in the future. “You should NEVER pay until the job is completed to your satisfaction.”

“Well, you don’t look like a thief.”

“It doesn’t matter! What if I were to be run over by a bulldozer tomorrow before I can get back to your house?”

Nobody except for professional builders EVER asked for a copy of my license and insurance. I used to carry a folder around with copies to hand out, but I finally just threw it away. This is very important. The license and insurance is for the homeowner’s benefit. The license indicates that maybe I know what I’m doing. The insurance is also for the homeowner’s benefit. If one of my men were not paying attention when a concrete truck was backing up and a chute hit him in the head, well, if I didn’t have workmen’s comp insurance, the homeowner is going to have to pay the hospital bills. If one of my men were smoking crack and decided to knock down the homeowner’s house with heavy equipment, my insurance would cover it IF I were insured.

“Can you get started this afternoon? I have a party this weekend and would like the driveway replaced by then”, is also a common inquiry. The answer, unless construction is really horrible as it is in Florida right now, would be a resounding “NO!” Good contractors are booked for weeks in advance. They have to be to cover the fixed costs of equipment, as well as the variable costs of labor. If I have a skilled crew who were good at what they did (and I did), I have to keep them busy or they’ll go to someone else who can.

Unfortunately in times of perceived economic downturn (or just to save a buck), homeowners decide that the licensed contractor with well-paid, skilled employees who is carrying the proper insurance are too expensive, and turn to an unlicensed individual that picks up day labor that can be found standing beside the road waiting to be hired for plumbing, grass mowing, roofing, concrete work, whatever anybody needs, they’re experts at. In some cases, having the “contractor” take the money and run would be the least expensive alternative for the homeowner. Having a bad contractor actually build something that has to be completely gutted and redone or repaired extensively is going to be expensive. Very, very expensive.

Update: SwampMan reminded me of the homeowners that would call asking if our employees wanted to do something “on the side”; i.e., unlicensed contracting at a cut-rate price. Then they would call to ask to borrow our tools.

Comments (2) »

Too Bad, So Sad About All Those Millions of Dollars Lost on Tomatoes….

Maybe it’s not the tomatoes after all.

That was the news from federal health officials Tuesday as they acknowledged that they’ve been stymied in their search for a culprit in an ongoing outbreak of salmonella that has affected nearly 900 people in 36 states since April.

After warning consumers for weeks that tomatoes were the prime suspect, officials with the Food and Drug Administration and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention said they are broadening their search to include other produce items.

“Tomatoes aren’t off the hook,” said Dr. David Acheson, the FDA’s associate commissioner for foods. “But now we’re expanding the investigation to additional produce items commonly served with tomatoes.”

While the CDC’s early investigation showed that more than 80 percent of those ill with salmonella had reported eating fresh tomatoes, Acheson said those tomatoes could have been eaten in salads or as part of another dish, such as salsa. Mindful of criticism that such warnings had translated into major losses for tomato growers, estimated at $500-million in Florida, officials declined to be more specific about their new targets.

“Frankly, it would be irresponsible to say specifically where we’re expanding our testing,” Acheson said, dodging questions about whether the search includes items such as lettuce, carrots and radishes. “As we expand our investigation and new information comes online, we’ll update our consumer messages as needed.”

For the time being, the FDA’s warning to consumers is to continue to avoid red round and Roma tomatoes grown in states that have not been cleared by the agency. Florida tomatoes are on the “safe-to-eat” list, as are cherry and grape tomatoes, as well as tomatoes on the vine.

Terence McElroy, spokesman for Florida’s department of agriculture, said the FDA’s expanded investigation is unlikely to affect the state’s growers. Few crops are still being harvested in the state for commercial sale, he said. And if the FDA is looking at salsa ingredients, such as cilantro or jalapeno peppers, they won’t find commercial producers of those crops in Florida.

More than half of the cases of Salmonella Saintpaul were identified in three states: Texas, New Mexico and Arizona. One case has been identified in Florida, but that person ate tomatoes elsewhere.

Source: St. Petersburg Times

Florida tomato growers lose $500,000,000, and all they get is an “oopsie!” from the FDA. I hate to think of what the total cost to tomato growers in other states was.

Comments (5) »

Those Pesky Climate Models

On July 9, 1971, the Post published a story headlined “U.S. Scientist Sees New Ice Age Coming.” It told of a prediction by NASA and Columbia University scientist S.I. Rasool. The culprit: man’s use of fossil fuels.

The Post reported that Rasool, writing in Science, argued that in “the next 50 years” fine dust that humans discharge into the atmosphere by burning fossil fuel will screen out so much of the sun’s rays that the Earth’s average temperature could fall by six degrees.

Sustained emissions over five to 10 years, Rasool claimed, “could be sufficient to trigger an ice age.”

Aiding Rasool’s research, the Post reported, was a “computer program developed by Dr. James Hansen,” who was, according to his resume, a Columbia University research associate at the time.

So what about those greenhouse gases that man pumps into the skies? Weren’t they worried about them causing a greenhouse effect that would heat the planet, as Hansen, Al Gore and a host of others so fervently believe today?

“They found no need to worry about the carbon dioxide fuel-burning puts in the atmosphere,” the Post said in the story, which was spotted last week by Washington resident John Lockwood, who was doing research at the Library of Congress and alerted the Washington Times to his finding.

Hansen has some explaining to do. The public deserves to know how he was converted from an apparent believer in a coming ice age who had no worries about greenhouse gas emissions to a global warming fear monger.

This is a man, as Lockwood noted in his message to the Times’ John McCaslin, who has called those skeptical of his global warming theory “court jesters.” We wonder: What choice words did he have for those who were skeptical of the ice age theory in 1971?

People can change their positions based on new information or by taking a closer or more open-minded look at what is already known. There’s nothing wrong with a reversal or modification of views as long as it is arrived at honestly.

But what about political hypocrisy? It’s clear that Hansen is as much a political animal as he is a scientist. Did he switch from one approaching cataclysm to another because he thought it would be easier to sell to the public? Was it a career advancement move or an honest change of heart on science, based on empirical evidence?

If Hansen wants to change positions again, the time is now. With NASA having recently revised historical temperature data that Hansen himself compiled, the door has been opened for him to embrace the ice age projections of the early 1970s.

Could be he’s feeling a little chill in the air again.

Source: Investor’s Business Daily

Heh. Well, predicting disaster has sure been profitable for many people over multiple disciplines. What has not changed is Hansen’s apparent mission to cripple the economy. Getting colder? Ice age is coming! Particulates from oil and coal caused it! Getting warmer? The planet is getting hotter! CO2 from oil and coal caused it! The present cooling period apparently does not yet exist until such time as he can figure out a way to blame carbon-based fuels.

In an earlier age, he would have been reading tea leaves or entrails and finding woodburning fires to blame for the inexplicable descent from warm weather into the little ice age. Woodburning fire deniers would have been proclaimed witches.

I’ve also noticed that he’s always going on about “consensus”. Well, Michael Crichton addressed that far better than I could:

I want to pause here and talk about this notion of consensus, and the rise of what has been called consensus science. I regard consensus science as an extremely pernicious development that ought to be stopped cold in its tracks. Historically, the claim of consensus has been the first refuge of scoundrels; it is a way to avoid debate by claiming that the matter is already settled. Whenever you hear the consensus of scientists agrees on something or other, reach for your wallet, because you’re being had.

Let’s be clear: the work of science has nothing whatever to do with consensus. Consensus is the business of politics. Science, on the contrary, requires only one investigator who happens to be right, which means that he or she has results that are verifiable by reference to the real world. In science consensus is irrelevant. What is relevant is reproducible results. The greatest scientists in history are great precisely because they broke with the consensus.

There is no such thing as consensus science. If it’s consensus, it isn’t science. If it’s science, it isn’t consensus. Period.

Well said.

Leave a comment »