Archive for dumbass government stunts

The IRS Targeted ALL Tea Party Groups

Surprise, surprise, surprise! Per the IG, the IRS targeted ALL groups with the name of Tea Party, Patriots, etc.

Salient points:

•70% of applications for tax-exempt status by all organizations of any kind were approved in fiscal year 2010
•Over an 18-month period, all applicants with the words “Tea Party” in their names were reviewed; later, “Patriots” and “9/12″ were added; other names included “We The People”
•58% of the groups chosen for review received requests for information from the IRS that were “unnecessary,” including the names of donors and “the type of conversations and discussions members and participants” had at meetings

•Because of the additional scrutiny applied to these groups, many experienced significant delays that entitled them to sue the IRS
•Because of the selection criteria based on names and conservative policy positions, some other politicized groups were missed by the IRS
•Senior IRS officials claim the wrongdoing was not instigated “by any individual or organization outside the IRS”
•There was “ineffective oversight by management” over the review process
•Officials in the Exempt Organizations division disagreed with some of the findings of the Treasury IG.

Rogue employees going off on their own? Still believe in fairy tales, too?

Gateway Pundit brings us this from Senator CHUCK SHUMER’s website:

A group of seven Senate Democrats urged the Internal Revenue Service on Monday to impose a strict cap on the amount of political spending by tax-exempt, nonprofit groups.

The senators said the lack of clarity in the IRS rules has allowed political groups to improperly claim 501(c)4 status and may even be allowing donors to these groups to wrongly claim tax deductions for their contributions. The senators promised legislation if the IRS failed to act to fix these problems.

“We urge the IRS to take these steps immediately to prevent abuse of the tax code by political groups focused on federal election activities. But if the IRS is unable to issue administrative guidance in this area then we plan to introduce legislation to accomplish these important changes,” the senators wrote.

The letter was signed by Senators Charles E. Schumer, Michael Bennet, Sheldon Whitehouse, Jeff Merkley, Tom Udall, Jeanne Shaheen and Al Franken. It follows an earlier letter, sent to the IRS by the same of group of senators last month, that also urged the IRS to better enforce rules pertaining to 501(c)4 organizations.

These are the people that are now in charge of your health care. They decide, not you, not your doctors, whether you, your spouse, your child, or your mother gets a lifesaving operation. Think about it.

Comments (3) »

Local Tea Party Group Took Over TWO YEARS (and until after the election) To Get Tax Exempt Status

So much for the conservative groups targeting being done by a few “low-level subordinates” out of a particular IRS office. The local (Jacksonville) Tea Party chapter reports that it took them over TWO YEARS to have their tax exempt status being approved, they had to send in additional paperwork after sending in requested paperwork that weighed over 4 pounds, AND they weren’t approved until after the 2012 election.

You will learn this from talk radio WOKV. I checked the local network news. Zip. Nada. Not interested.

Leave a comment »

And We’re Supposed to Send Them Our Medical Information

It seems that IRS employees have been busy busy busy under Obama. Why, those sneaky pro-Obama minions have been (independently) gathering tax (and other) information on groups that are subversively promulgating small government and teaching the constitution. They are (indepedently) singling out GOP business leaders, doing abusive audits, and (independently) releasing information (often false) to the press which have been running to make it front page information like the lapdogs they are (go fetch the tax return information, boy. Now print it! Good boy!)

The IRS is also improperly (and illegally) accessing allegedly confidential medical records. Electronic medical records make this sooooo much easier.

“This is an action involving the corruption and abuse of power by several Internal Revenue Service agents,” the complaint reads. “No search warrant authorized the seizure of these records; no subpoena authorized the seizure of these records; none of the 10,000,000 Americans were under any kind of known criminal or civil investigation and their medical records had no relevance whatsoever to the IRS search. IT personnel at the scene, a HIPPA facility warning on the building and the IT portion of the searched premises, and the company executives each warned the IRS agents of these privileged records,” it continued.

According to the case, the IRS agents had a search warrant for financial data pertaining to a former employee of the John Doe company, however, “it did not authorize any seizure of any healthcare or medical record of any persons, least of all third parties completely unrelated to the matter,” the complaint read.

So. The IRS was (allegedly) looking for the financial data of a former employee of a health care records company. In order to look for that financial data, they illegally seized what are supposed to be the completely confidential health records of 10,000,000 people. They did not have a search warrant for the medical records. The medical records had nothing to do with what they were searching for. And the people with the medical records were not being investigated and, even if they were, the medical records were supposed to be off limits. Can you see the potential for blackmail here? I know I can.

Starting next year, we’re supposed to be providing the IRS with information with which they can access our health records. I’m VERY uncomfortable about complying with this. “Oh, no, you’re just WRONG!” you might say. “The government would NEVER abuse their power that way!” Really?

Operation Fast and Furious: Providing guns to narcoterrorists in order to overturn the 2nd amendment of the Constitution of the United States. U.S. citizens were killed. This was done BY THE GOVERNMENT. Prosecutions: Zero. Accountability: Zero. How about targeted tax audits and information gathering by the IRS? Government employees did this. Government agencies know who worked on these. If anybody foolishly thinks this was just a few low-level employees striking out on their own, you’ve never worked for the Federal government. This was ordered and approved. Names and accountability? Zero. Let’s go to the very tippy top of the government where a U.S. ambassador’s security was deliberately removed in a *very* dangerous location. Calls for help were ignored except by two ex-Navy SEALs who saved the lives of 30 to 40 people at the expense of their own. The ambassador and a diplomat were killed. Names of the people that were responsible? Accountability? Swept under the rug. It happened SUCH a long time ago, you see. Where was Obama? Who ordered the rescue teams to stand down? *crickets* Who approved the information gathering of every single phone call made by and to AP employees on their personal and private lines? *crickets*

It is waaaaaay past time that our tax code was replaced with a flat tax where there are no special favors or dispensations for the politically well connected (and punitive taxes for those who aren’t), everybody pays taxes, and the IRS isn’t a bully agency gathering information for the government. And, no, I don’t like the idea at all of the IRS being in the healthcare business.

I’m also way past being patient with government agency heads and the people that work for them not being held accountable and/or prosecuted by the (in)Justice Department for said abuses. Most of Obama’s appointees have committed egregious abuses of power and/or actually broke the law and Obama, of course, knows absolutely nothing about any of it. Oddly enough, he’s also not asked for any resignations over it. The press is acting like none of these things ever happened. The only reason I can think of is it is because they didn’t want to jeopardize his ability to abuse his power for a second term.

Is Obama really that disengaged, that intellectually incurious, that much of a dumbass that he doesn’t know what his underlings are doing (completely independently with no direction whatsoever from him), or did the orders for these multiple abuses of power originate from his office? Either way, the man should not be the President.

Leave a comment »

Why Did Hillary Clinton and Obama want Ambassador Stevens Dead?

Why did they want the Navy Seals dead? After listening to the testimony today (and most of the people that the committee want to talk to are still blocked), the only conclusion that I can draw is that the terrorists may have killed them, but Hillary and Obama were responsible for putting them in harm’s way, removing security, and then refusing to back them up.

Nobody can be that damned incompetent.

The families and friends of Ambassador Stevens, Sean Smith, Glen Doherty, and Tyrone Woods deserve answers. And were they my family members, I’d want retribution.

The Democrats’ attitudes are disgusting me. They’re busily trying to draw attention away from what happened.

Hillary and Barry killed those men.

How can you trust ANYTHING coming from the government?

Comments (13) »

Obama Administration Set to Make Cuts That Would Most Hurt Taxpayers

Instead of removing folk at the Department of Justice and ATF who are busily running guns to foreign drug gangs (God knows that they wouldn’t deign to help anybody in the U.S.), or the people at the EPA who are trying to shut down the nation’s power supplies, the Obama administration has instead decided to move on to furloughing people that do a job that is essential to the wellbeing of millions of Americans: The food inspectors.

Sanderson Farms, Inc., the third- largest U.S. chicken processor, said the removal of food-safety inspectors because of federal budget cuts set to go into effect next week would disrupt its operations.

The company is prohibited by law from operating poultry- processing plants without the presence of federal inspectors and would have to shut plants in their absence, Laurel, Mississippi- based Sanderson said in a filing today.

The closing of plants owned by Sanderson, a supplier to grocery chains Kroger Co. and Supervalu Inc., would be one of the effects of the automatic U.S. federal budget cuts set to begin March 1 unless President Barack Obama and Congress work out a deal to avoid or postpone them.

So, all you folks on a fixed income out there (that would apply to anybody earning a paycheck, by the way, because the boss can’t afford to give out wage increases every time the Federal government is out of control which would be constantly) or on a limited income retirement are about to be screwed AGAIN by the people that have already screwed you pretty seriously on food prices by putting food into your vehicle’s gas tank (to the detriment of said vehicles, I might add). Now, out of all the people that the Federal government COULD pick for furloughs that would never be noticed, they just happen to pick the folks whose absence will shut down entire industries. WHAT a coincidence!

The USDA is considering furloughing inspectors for 15 days as part of automatic U.S. federal budget cuts, known as sequestration. The move could spur the “first widespread shortage” of meat, poultry and egg products in generations, according to a letter sent to Secretary of Agriculture Tom Vilsack (DEMOCRAT) on Feb. 11 by three dozen trade groups from across the country.

I believe that “widespread shortage” of meat, poultry and egg products is EXACTLY what the Federal government wants. This is not an accident, folks.

A 15-day furlough resulting from the cuts could cost more than $10 billion in production losses and industry workers could lose more than $400 million in wages, Vilsack (DEMOCRAT) said in a Feb. 5 letter to Senator Barbara Mikulski, (DEMOCRAT), chairwoman of the appropriations committee.

Sounds like an e-mail probably went out that said “Barbi, we believe we have identified the folks in this department whose loss will do the greatest damage to the taxpayers, the food industry, and the economy! Everybody else’s job is secure. Give my regards to Barry. Y’all have fun with this now!” to me.

If the Federal government has enough power to petulantly shut down food operations that will negatively effect millions of citizens and cause hundreds of millions of dollars in damages, they have too much power. It is waaaaaay past time that states got together and cut the Federal government out of their business.

I’m pretty sure that those Federal inspector positions could be filled pretty darn quickly by the states and/or private sector, and probably at a lower cost, too.

Edited to add that a lack of poultry or eggs at the grocery store won’t affect me AT ALL.

Leave a comment »

Sequestration? The World Is Ending Again!

I haven’t been paying too much attention to sequestration because, frankly, I’m more than a little tired of the incompetent drama queens running the country and getting attention by screaming about the crises that are politically created. “Look at me, look at me! See what I’m doing NOW if somebody doesn’t stop me!” is not an attractive trait in somebody older than, say, three.

So when I finally started looking at sequestration and found that all the hoo ha was not about actual cuts, but a 2% reduction in spending growth for the government, I was pretty much gobsmacked. After all, didn’t all the working folks in America just get an involuntary 2% pay cut in January via social security taxes? I got a 3% pay cut last year, too, in REAL pay cuts, not a 3% cut out of a raise. That added up to a 5% REAL pay cut.

Must. Be. Calm. Breathe. Breathe. Breathe.

YOU FUCKING ASSHOLES! How DARE you screw with the livelihood of people, AGAIN, for (expletive deleted) political advantage? You’re ALL a bunch of corrupt thieves and the whole country would be far better off if Washington, D.C. was hit by an asteroid and you all perished in a fiery death! Hell, cutting off the first family vacation allowance as well as Nancy Pelosi’s liquor allowance would go a long way toward making up budget shortfalls. Make a (expletive deleted) budget and (expletive deleted) follow it and make some REAL (expletive deleted) cuts and don’t come whining to ME about imaginary cuts! Hell, don’t come whining to me about cuts at all. Shut up and do your (expletive deleted) job.

Breathe. Breathe. Breathe.

Wish I could say what I really think.

Comments (9) »

Here’s Why the DHS Needs All That Ammo

target7target6target5target4target3target2target1They have new targets to shoot! Because this is what terrorists look like to the government: They appear to be white, middle class, and in their own homes or neighborhoods. So why would DHS agents be practicing shooting people down in their own homes and on playgrounds?

Comments (7) »

Is Obama Insane?

From his crazy rant today:

“Air traffic controllers and airport security will see cutbacks, which means more delays at airports across the country,” Obama continued. “Thousands of teachers and educators will be laid off. Tens of thousands of parents will have to scramble to find child care for their kids. Hundreds of thousands of Americans will lose access to primary care and preventive care like flu vaccinations and cancer screenings.

Really. Last time I checked, my property taxes in my state were paying for teachers. My daughter pays child care, not the federal government. Lose access to primary care? Most of us are doing that directly because of Obamacare. Lose flu vaccines? Hell, they’re not even made in America anymore. I don’t particularly give a shit about the airports because, since the TSA abomination, I don’t fly and, according to the people that do, the service SUCKS.

Oh, he’s not insane, he’s pandering to the low-information voters? Bullshit. Call it what it is. He’s pandering to the low IQ voters. But that doesn’t mean he’s not insane.

Comments (6) »

Interesting Question

Paul Hsieh at PJ Media asks the question: Would New Gun Laws Spark Widespread Civil Disobedience?

Heh. My immediate and gut-felt reaction upon reading the title was “Do bears shit in the woods?” I suppose I could be wrong and those people that are busily engaged in buying up all the guns and ammo and high-capacity magazines may just be acquiring them in order to peacefully surrender them to the government without recompense upon demand, but that seems pretty damned unlikely to me.

The premise for these gun-grabbing tactics appears to be “public safety”. I note that there are no concerted efforts underway to disarm the drug gangs murdering each other as well as innocent bystanders in the cities. Interesting. They (Democrats) appear only interested in disarming law-abiding citizens (for the children, of course). I also note that, curiously, there are no steps being taken to increase the funding for mental health care and hospital beds for the seriously insane even though the people that committed mass shooting events could be the poster kids for batshit crazy.

Something smells REAL bad about this whole gun grab, folks. This is allegedly being done in the name of public safety, yet has nothing to do with public safety. Things like this and the Great DHS Ammunition Buy (of 1.6 billion bullets) make me think dark things about “our” government, although we are reassured by the Huffington Post that there is a perfectly logical explanation for this. Yessirree. The Federal government wants to save us all money, you see, and it is cheaper to buy ammo in bulk.

Put me down under civil disobedience, please.

Comments (5) »

Dang, I Hate Whining and Excuses for Gross Incompetence

As most of y’all know, I’ve been in business and run businesses for most of my life. When major fuckups problems occur, as they will, I don’t want to hear whining. I don’t want to hear excuses. I just want an explanation as to how could something go so far wrong, what was done to fix it, and what assurances I have that it will never, ever happen again.

You can, therefore, perhaps picture my astonishment when the DNC offers a half-assed apology for a HUGE screw up and then wants to blame Romney per ABC News:

Organizers of last week’s Democratic National Convention apologized today for accidentally showing an image of the Russian navy during a tribute to U.S. veterans.

Soviet-era Russian warships were projected on a big screen above veterans as they stood on the convention stage last Thursday while retired Adm. John Nathman delivered remarks honoring those who serve.

“Due to vendor error, incorrect images appeared briefly on screen behind fifty-one veterans during the convention and the DNCC apologizes for this mistake,” the Democratic National Convention Committee said in a written statement to the Navy Times. “This error should not distract from the words of Admiral Nathman and others who spoke to President Obama’s strong record on issues that impact those who have served our nation.”

Never missing an opportunity, the DNCC also included a jab at GOP nominee Mitt Romney in its apology.

“We’re proud of the service and sacrifice of our veterans and military families, and while they were an important and active part our of convention, Mitt Romney failed to even mention them in his speech in Tampa,” they said.

Okay. Let me get this straight. The DNC projects pictures of the SOVIET NAVY while they’re supposedly “honoring” veterans that have served. The DNC was not sufficiently interested in “honoring” the veterans that they made any actual effort to ensure that they were projecting pictures of American ships. I’m sure that, had they asked politely, the Navy would have been more than happy to supply actual pictures of actual ships of the United States Navy. Of course, they could have Googled images of (U.S.) Navy ships online, which any competent third grade student should be able to do, but then we ARE talking about the DNC. I suppose we should be happy that we didn’t get photographs of the Japanese fleet during WWII, or perhaps some German U-boats.

Perhaps I wrong them, though, in attributing this slap at veterans to mere gross incompetence. Perhaps it was deliberate and they were saluting their ideological heroes.

This “apology” is how you can tell that the people of the DNC have never had to work at a job where they were personally accountable. If they had, they would know enough to stop digging, issue a real apology, and take responsibility for their stupidity. But that isn’t what happened. Of course not.

Their reaction reminds me of nothing so much as how a 3-year-old child refuses to accept responsibility.

Adult: “DNC, what is that horrible smell? Did you poop in your Pull Ups?”

DNC: “Noooooo. The vendors pooped in my Pull Ups!”

Adult: “WHAT?”

DNC: *Pointing Outside* “And Mitt Romney didn’t even WEAR Pull Ups in Tampa!”

Adult: “WHAT?”

Comments (1) »

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.