Just back from helping take the lil’ grandkids trick or treating. Unlike last year, not many people here giving out candy for little goblins, no doubt a sign of the economy.
Archive for October, 2008
Corn: Nationally, 96 percent of the corn crop was mature, 4 points behind last year and 3 points behind the 5-year average. Nebraska acreage at 87 percent mature was the farthest behind, lagging 13 points behind the average. The crop was within 6 points of full maturity elsewhere. Producers had harvested 39 percent of the national crop, 31 points behind last year and 27 points behind the 5-year average. Producers in the Dakotas had harvested the smallest amount of their planted acreage, with 4 and 16 percent of the crop harvested in North Dakota and South Dakota, respectively. Harvest was also well behind in Illinois, Iowa, and Missouri. Condition of the corn crop improved 2 points from last week, reaching 64 percent good to excellent.
Soybeans: Producers had harvested 76 percent of the soybean acreage, 5 points behind last year, and 7 points behind the 5-year average.
Winter Wheat: In the winter wheat growing areas, the majority of the rain fell over Kansas and Nebraska. Totals reached 5 inches in isolated areas, while only light, scattered showers fell over areas to the south in the Oklahoma and Texas panhandles. Nationally, planting of winter wheat was complete on 84 percent of the acreage, 2 points behind last year and 4 points behind the 5-year average. Major planting activity was evident in Illinois, Indiana, and Oregon, where at least 15 percent of the crop was planted during the week. Producers completed seeding acreage in Colorado and Ohio. Producers in Arkansas and Missouri were planting their acreage 16 and 20 points, respectively, behind the 5-year average. Nationally, 69 percent of the crop had emerged, 3 points ahead of last year, but the same as the 5-year average. The winter wheat crop was rated 65 percent good to excellent.
Cotton: Nationally, 92 percent of the cotton acreage had open bolls, 3 points behind last year, and 1 point behind the 5-year average. Producers had harvested 40 percent of the crop, 7 points behind last year and 5 points behind the 5-year average. In California and Mississippi, harvest lagged 22 and 20 points, respectively, behind the average. Cotton condition was 48 percent good to excellent, unchanged from the previous week.
Rice: Ninety-five percent of the rice crop was harvested, 1 point ahead of last year, but 1 point behind the 5-year average. Harvest was complete in Louisiana and Texas. Harvest was 7 points ahead of the average pace in California, but was at or behind elsewhere.
Peanuts: Peanut producers had harvested 66 percent of the acreage, 7 points ahead of last year’s harvest pace, but 1 point behind the 5-year average. Harvest was very active in all States, with between 10 and 23 percent of the crop being harvested during the week.
Other Crops: Sugarbeet producers had harvested three-fourths of the acreage, 6 points behind last year, and 9 points behind the 5-year average. Harvest in Minnesota and North Dakota was most advanced, while major harvest activity during the week occurred in Idaho and Michigan. Twenty-two percent of the sunflower acreage was harvested, 25 points behind last year and 31 points behind the 5 year average. Other than Colorado, where harvest was 1 point ahead of the 5-year average, harvest was more than 30 points behind the average pace.
Heritage never endorsed Obama’s tax plan, as his ads on television say they did, at all. Why would he lie about something so obvious and easy to check? (This seems to be a recurring theme.)
Anybody that thinks that Obama’s tax plan of wealth redistribution will lead to economic growth needs to get their medications changed.
The economy improves under each plan as compared to the baseline. The baseline forecast assumes that all of the Bush tax cuts disappear, which raises the cost of capital and marginal tax rates. Both candidates plan to reduce taxes compared to this scenario.
Senator McCain’s plan is substantially better at spurring economic growth than Senator Obama’s. This is not surprising, since Senator McCain focuses on economic growth and job creation while Senator Obama focuses on the redistribution of income. As Tax Policy Center Director Len Burman states, “the major themes of the two plans are, in the case of Senator McCain’s plan, that the major emphasis is on economic efficiency—cuts marginal tax rates, improves economic incentives…. In the case of Obama’s plan, the goal is primarily to improve progressivity…to lower tax burdens on low-income people and raise them on higher-income people.” Each presidential candidate achieves his stated goal,with Senator McCain generating the most new jobs, growth, and additional income for individuals. Senator Obama’s plan drives up the tax rate for individuals with annual incomes above $250,000 and redistributes money to workers with lower incomes.
After months of campaign trail eloquence, we’ve finally learned what Senator Obama’s economic goal is: to spread the wealth. In a radio interview revealed this week, he said the same thing — that one of the quote, “tragedies” of the civil rights movement is that it didn’t bring about “redistributive change.”
You see, Senator Obama believes in redistributing wealth, not in policies that grow our economy and create jobs. He said that even though lower taxes on investment help our economy, he favors higher taxes on investment for quote “fairness.” There’s nothing “fair” about driving our economy into the ground. We all suffer when that happens, and that is the problem with Senator Obama’s approach to our economy. He is more interested in controlling wealth than in creating it … in redistributing money instead of spreading opportunity. I am going to create wealth for all Americans, by creating opportunity for all Americans.
Senator Obama is running to be Redistributionist in Chief. I’m running to be Commander in Chief. Senator Obama is running to spread the wealth. I’m running to create more wealth. Senator Obama is running to punish the successful. I’m running to make everyone successful.
From a speech by John McCain today.
My daughter’s car started pouring out smoke this morning as she was driving to work in the left hand lane of the freeway. She was able to get it pulled over to the side and safely stopped in the grass before she had to go across a bridge. The tow truck driver arrived to find her crying in her car because she could not reach me (I was already at work and had my phone turned off for the day) and she didn’t have her daddy’s cell phone number entered into that cell phone, a replacement for the one that had gone through the washer and dryer and then inexplicably refused to function. To top it all off, she was now late for work and had no idea how she was even going to get home, get the kids out of day care, or pay for any vehicle repairs.
The tow truck driver, to stop her tears, offered to buy her a cup of coffee (she doesn’t drink it), offered a cigarette (she doesn’t smoke) and when that failed, loaned her his car to drive to work. He had never seen her before! He towed the vehicle back to a family-owned mechanic shop, had it looked at, and called her at work to tell her that it was the master cylinder that had gone out, sprayed brake fluid all over the engine; hence the smoke. Well, she had had the master cylinder replaced 2 months ago at a brake shop. The driver opined that it should still be under warranty, and the car should be towed over to the facility that had replaced it. There was just one problem; her insurance did not cover the additional towing and the towing fee of $60 would have to be paid up front. There was no charge for diagnosing the problem.
They (mechanic shop and tow truck driver) paid the additional towing fee for her, and told her that she could repay them when she returned the car that afternoon. She suspects that he also had a lil’ talk with the place that had replaced the master cylinder 2 months ago because when she walked in to collect her car after work and to see if she owed any additional money (which she did not have), they just handed her the keys.
Read about it at Gateway Pundit.
From Bluey’s Blog:
In a local restaurant my server had on a “Obama 08″ tie, again I laughed as he had given away his political preference–just imagine the coincidence.
When the bill came I decided not to tip the server and explained to him that I was exploring the Obama redistribution of wealth concept. He stood there in disbelief while I told him that I was going to redistribute his tip to someone who I deemed more in need–the homeless guy outside. The server angrily stormed from my sight.
I went outside, gave the homeless guy $10 and told him to thank the server inside as I’ve decided he could use the money more. The homeless guy was grateful.
At the end of my rather unscientific redistribution experiment I realized the homeless guy was grateful for the money he did not earn, but the waiter was pretty angry that I gave away the money he did earn even though the actual recipient deserved money more.
I guess redistribution of wealth is an easier thing to swallow in concept than in practical application.
A lot of people that blithely support redistribution of wealth do not think that it will apply to them.